ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence on the effectiveness of inactivated vaccines against the Delta and Omicron (BA.2.38) variants remains scarce. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to estimate the adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) of one, two, and three doses of inactivated vaccines in attenuating pneumonia, severe COVID-19, and the duration of viral shedding in Delta and Omicron cases using modified Poisson and linear regression as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 561 COVID-19 cases were included (59.2% Delta and 40.8% Omicron). In total, 56.4% (184) of Delta and 12.0% (27) of Omicron cases had COVID-19 pneumonia. In the two-dose vaccinated population, 1.4% of Delta and 89.1% of Omicron cases were vaccinated for more than 6 months. In Delta cases, the two-dose aVE was 52% (95% confidence interval, 39-63%) against pneumonia and 61% (15%, 82%) against severe disease. Two-dose vaccination reduced the duration of viral shedding in Delta cases, but not in booster-vaccinated Omicron cases. In Omicron cases, three-dose aVE was 68% (18%, 88%) effective against pneumonia, while two-dose vaccination was insufficient for Omicron. E-values were calculated, and the E-values confirmed the robustness of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: In Delta cases, two-dose vaccination within 6 months reduced pneumonia, disease severity, and the duration of viral shedding. Booster vaccination provided a high level of protection against pneumonia with Omicron and should be prioritized.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel acute respiratory infectious disease that can lead to multiple-organ dysfunction in patients with severe disease. However, there is a lack of effective antiviral drugs for COVID-19. Herein, we investigated the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy for treating severe COVID-19 in an attempt to explore new therapeutic methods. The clinical data of 3 imported patients with severe COVID-19 who underwent treatment with CP and who were quarantined and treated in a designated COVID-19 hospital from March 2020 to April 2020 were collected and analyzed. The 3 patients, including a 57-year-old male, 65-year-old female, and 59-year-old female, were clinically classified as having severe COVID-19. The main underlying diseases included hypertension, diabetes, sequelae of cerebral infarction, and postoperative thyroid adenoma. The common symptoms included cough, fever, and shortness of breath. All patients received antiviral drugs and other supportive treatments. Additionally, CP treatment was administered. At 48 to 72 hours after the CP transfusion, all 3 of the patients exhibited an improvement and alleviation of symptoms, an elevated arterial oxygen saturation, and decreased C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 levels. The counts of the total lymphocytes and T lymphocytes (CD3+) and their subsets (CD4 + and CD8+) were also obviously increased. Repeated chest computed tomography also revealed obvious absorption of the lesions in the bilateral lungs. Only 1 patient had a mild allergic reaction during the CP infusion, but no severe adverse reactions were observed. The early treatment with CP in patients with severe COVID-19 can rapidly improve the condition of the patients, and CP therapy is generally effective and safe.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Immunization, Passive/methods , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 SerotherapyABSTRACT
Background and Purpose: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rapidly resulted in a pandemic. Information on patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) is limited. This study investigated the clinical features and the risk factors of developing adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and with previous CVD. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective clinical study including all the confirmed cases of COVID-19 at Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital from February 4 to April 7, 2020. Differences in clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without a history of CVD. The incidences of severe events comprising all-cause death, intensive care unit admission, shock, and mechanical ventilation usage during hospitalization in two groups were compared using propensity score matching analysis and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Besides, the risk factors of developing severe events in patients with COVID-19 who also have history of CVD were analyzed. Results: A total of 2,554 consecutive patients were included in our study, of whom 109 (4.27%) had a medical history of CVD. Patients with CVD tend to be older and with more comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The levels of white blood cell, neutrophil, C-reactive protein, creatine kinase isoenzymes, and lactate dehydrogenase were higher, whereas the levels of lymphocyte and albumin were lower in the CVD group. Compared to those without CVD, patients with CVD were more likely to have severe events after age matching (12.8 vs. 5.7%, P = 0.012). After adjusting for the confounding effects of age, sex, smoking, and comorbidities, the odds ratio for developing severe events with a history of CVD was 2.326 (95% CI, 1.168–4.630;P = 0.016). Besides, patients with CVD, either with decreased lymphocyte count (OR 9.192, 95% CI, 1.410–59.902, P = 0.020) or increased blood urea nitrogen (OR 5.916, 95% CI, 1.072–32.641, P = 0.041), had a higher risk of developing severe events during hospitalization. Conclusions: Patients with CVD history tend to have adverse clinical outcomes after being infected with SARS-COV-2. Decreased lymphocyte counts and increased blood urea nitrogen levels may be risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19, and had CVD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics and appropriate dose regimens of favipiravir are unknown in hospitalized influenza patients; such data are also needed to determine dosage selection for favipiravir trials in COVID-19. METHODS: In this dose-escalating study, favipiravir pharmacokinetics and tolerability were assessed in critically ill influenza patients. Participants received one of two dosing regimens; Japan licensed dose (1600 mg BID on day 1 and 600 mg BID on the following days) and the higher dose (1800 mg/800 mg BID) trialed in uncomplicated influenza. The primary pharmacokinetic endpoint was the proportion of patients with a minimum observed plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) ≥20 mg/L at all measured time points after the second dose. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled into the low dose group and 19 patients into the high dose group of the study. Favipiravir Ctrough decreased significantly over time in both groups (p <0.01). Relative to day 2 (48 hrs), concentrations were 91.7% and 90.3% lower in the 1600/600 mg group and 79.3% and 89.5% lower in the 1800/800 mg group at day 7 and 10, respectively. In contrast, oseltamivir concentrations did not change significantly over time. A 2-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination described the observed favipiravir concentration-time data well. Modeling demonstrated that less than 50% of patients achieved Ctrough ≥20 mg/L for >80% of the duration of treatment of the two dose regimens evaluated (18.8% and 42.1% of patients for low and high dose regimen, respectively). Increasing the favipravir dosage predicted a higher proportion of patients reaching this threshold of 20 mg/L, suggesting that dosing regimens of ≥3600/2600 mg might be required for adequate concentrations. The two dosing regimens were well-tolerated in critical ill patients with influenza. CONCLUSION: The two dosing regimens proposed for uncomplicated influenza did not achieve our pre-defined treatment threshold.